Not for instant gratification

Photography is not a good hobby for me. Firstly, because it is the most common hobby in the world and I don't like to be in the mainstream. Secondly, it is a demanding hobby, if you take it seriously: the equipment is expensive, you have to go out, talk to people and get their approval if you wish to shoot their portraits and then you have to sort, select and process the photos. Thirdly and most importantly - I do not think that I'm very good at it.

And yet, it is my favourite hobby. I invest a lot of money and time and I make a point to process and publish my photos. I even trained in order to be able to hold the camera steadily. Even though in order to take a photo all you need is to full-press the button, it's not about instant gratification. Infact, taking a good photo resembles a football game: the team will try several times until it scores, and often just one in ten kicks will produce a goal. In photography, it can be one out of hundred.

But I still do it. And I especially like street photography, which is considered to be one of the hardest. So why do I keep on doing it? The first reason I can think of is that when I manage to take a properly good photo, I do feel that I have accomplished something. The second reason is that I genuinely like it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Invisible Hands

I don't believe in invisible, unproven things. They may exist, and people surely religiously believe in them (literally) but when they fail, they do it so spectacularly and inexplicably. When an airplane crashes, it also does it spectacularly, but at least you can gather hard evidence and explain what happened, how it happened, and whether we can prevent it in the future. When one of the "invisible hands" - the of god and the one of the market fails, we can usually explain what happened, but we can rarely explain how it happened and we can never prevent things of happening in the future. When an airplane crashes, the solutions that are being given may include re-engineering the failed parts, changes to the maintenance procedures or sometimes, simply decide to stop using the aircraft altogether, like the Concorde in 2003. But the believers in those invisible hands, will still religiously protect their beliefs, saying things like "we lost our faith, that's why we
Read more

Another Short Review: Shure SE215 IEM

Image
After a few years of using solely Sennehiser IEMs (In Ear Monitors, a fancy name for in-ear headphone or earbuds), I was convinced to buy the Shure SE215. These earphones are the lowest in Shure's range of IEMs that includes the SE315, SE425 and SE535. I always perceived Shure as a firm that makes very good high-end models, but neglects the middle range. Apparently, the SE215 is a break from this tradition, which they made in order to cash in the ever growing number of portable media players and smartphone. The SE215 received excellent reviews, like "the best under $100 you can buy" and another review "$100 earphones should not sound that good". My own opinion is not different: the build quality is great: the design is utilitarian and sturdy but pleasant, with detachable cables and memory-foam or silicone tips. The SE215 feel like a quality product and they make me believe that they won't start disintegrating like the Sennheiser IE6 did. They are also
Read more

So why do I like the iPhone 4

The geeks of this world are divided into two groups: those who adore Apple and those who hate it. You may claim that this is not the case, and that there are some people who combine the use of Apple products with the use of products from other brands, but they are certainly not "Apple Fanboys". Those people are not really geeks then. People who choose their technology according to their usability and not according to their brands simply can't cut it as "real" geeks... I belong to the Apple haters, and I have the usual geeky reasons: their products are beautifully designed but always flawed and their attitude towards their customers and developers reminds me of either a feudalistic or a totalitarian regime. In fact, the way Apple fanboys (and fangirls) talk about Apple reminds me very much of a religion. Those who know me might remember my hypothesis that every religion has: God or a prophet (Steven Jobs), An unmistakable symbol (the bitten apple logo) Shrines or
Read more